FileFeedback vs Loom
Loom is excellent for recording and sharing quick video updates. FileFeedback is different: it's where clients review your work, leave precise comments, and give formal approval. Two different workflows.
An honest look at what each tool supports.
| Feature | FileFeedback | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Video review | ||
| Image review | ||
| PDF review | ||
| Audio review | ||
| Guest access — no login required | ||
| Frame-accurate timecodes | ||
| Guest approvals & rejections | ||
| Emoji reactions on comments | ||
| Version history | ||
| Portfolios & collection sharing | ||
| White-label branding | ||
| Flat team pricing (no per-seat) | ||
| Free plan |
Loom is for recording and sharing short videos of yourself. FileFeedback is for submitting finished creative work for client review. The use case is fundamentally different — and the product quality shows when you try to use Loom for professional proofing.
With Loom, you send a video and hope for a reply. FileFeedback gives every project a defined review status: in review, approved, or revisions requested. Every decision is logged with who made it and when.
Your deliverables include finished videos, design files, PDFs, and audio. FileFeedback reviews all of them with purpose-built tools. Loom is a one-trick tool in a multi-asset world.
Stop hoping clients reply to Loom recordings. FileFeedback turns reviews into a structured, trackable workflow.
Start free today