FileFeedback vs Markup.io
Markup.io excels at website feedback. But if you're delivering videos, ad creatives, or PDFs alongside websites, you need a tool built for all of them — not one retrofitted for them.
An honest look at what each tool supports.
| Feature | FileFeedback | Markup.io |
|---|---|---|
| Video review | ||
| Image review | ||
| PDF review | ||
| Audio review | ||
| Guest access — no login required | ||
| Frame-accurate timecodes | ||
| Guest approvals & rejections | ||
| Emoji reactions on comments | ||
| Version history | ||
| Portfolios & collection sharing | ||
| White-label branding | ||
| Flat team pricing (no per-seat) | ||
| Free plan |
Markup.io's video support is basic. There's no frame-accurate scrubbing, no timecode comments, no professional playback controls. If video is core to what you deliver, this matters enormously when it comes to getting useful feedback.
Agencies don't just build websites. You deliver social clips, ad banners, video ads, PDF proposals, and event photography. FileFeedback keeps every deliverable type — and every version of it — in one clean client workspace.
FileFeedback includes a formal approval workflow: clients can approve or request revisions directly from their review link, with no account required. The project gets a clear status — no more chasing email confirmations.
Website feedback, video review, PDF annotations, client approvals — all in one workspace. Start free.
Start free today