FileFeedback
Video ReviewFrame-accurate video commentsDesign FeedbackPinpoint annotations on imagesClient ApprovalsApprove or request revisionsPDF ReviewComment on any page, any element
VideographersAgenciesDesignersInternal TeamsPhotographersMarketing Teams
vs Frame.iovs Markup.iovs Ziflow
View all comparisons

Video editor tools

Cost CalculatorDay Rate CalculatorWorkflow TemplateProposal BuilderClient BriefRevision TrackerShot List BuilderShoot Day ChecklistOnboarding ScorecardFree Asset Finder
View all free tools →
BlogPricing
Log inGet started

FileFeedback vs Marker.io

FileFeedback vs Marker.io: different tools for different problems.

Marker.io captures annotated bug reports on live websites and pushes them to Jira, Trello, or GitHub. FileFeedback collects structured feedback on live websites — plus video, PDFs, images, and audio — and routes it to formal client approvals.

Start free — no credit card View all comparisons

Side-by-side comparison

An honest look at what each tool supports.

FeatureFileFeedbackMarker.io
Live website annotation
Video review with frame-accurate timecodes
PDF review & annotation
Image / design file review
Audio review with waveform markers
Guest access — no client login required
Formal client approval workflow
Version history per file
Jira / GitHub / Trello push integration
White-label branding
Portfolios & client galleries
Free plan
Flat team pricing (no per-seat)
Fully supported Partially supported Not supported

Why teams switch to FileFeedback

01

Client approvals vs bug tickets

Marker.io is designed to help developers track bugs — feedback becomes a Jira ticket or GitHub issue in a developer queue. FileFeedback is designed to help agencies get client sign-off — feedback becomes a revision request, and once resolved the client formally approves the final version with a timestamp on record. These are different end goals, even if both start with someone clicking on a website.

02

Review any file type, not just websites

Agencies deliver websites alongside video campaigns, PDF documents, images, and audio content. Marker.io reviews websites only. FileFeedback handles all of these in the same workspace — clients always go to one URL regardless of what they're reviewing this week.

03

Built around the client relationship

Marker.io is built for internal developer workflows. FileFeedback is built for the agency–client relationship: link-based access with no client login required, a clean review experience that doesn't expose internal tools, and a formal approval step that protects the agency legally.

04

Free plan included

Marker.io has no free plan — pricing starts at $39/month. FileFeedback offers a free plan that includes website review, video review, PDF annotation, and image feedback. For freelancers and small studios, this removes the barrier to starting.

Website feedback, video review, PDFs, and formal approvals.

Everything Marker.io does on live websites — plus every other file type your agency produces, with a proper client sign-off at the end.

Start free today